| To: | Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: %u-order allocation failed |
| From: | Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Oct 2001 23:53:18 +0100 |
| Cc: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.3.96.1011009001720.20446A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.3.96.1011009001720.20446A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .cz> |
| Reply-to: | Alex Bligh - linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
--On Tuesday, 09 October, 2001 12:21 AM +0200 Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: If you have more than half of virtual space free, you can always find two consecutive free pages. Period. Now calculate the probability of not being able to do this in physical space, assuming even page dispersion, and many pages free. You will find it is very small. This may give you a clue as to what the problem actually is. -- Alex Bligh |
| Previous by Date: | Re: %u-order allocation failed, David Lang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: .deb kernel packages, Gerard W. Patterson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: %u-order allocation failed, David Lang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: %u-order allocation failed, Mikulas Patocka |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |