| To: | Hristo Grigorov <Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch? |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Oct 2001 10:30:09 -0500 |
| Cc: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011008090816.03ebe8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011008144630.FSNN26796.fep02-app.kolumbus.fi@there> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hristo Grigorov wrote: > Hmm, may I have more information on that ? I have VIA system but I thought > that the other subsystems of the kernel are taking care about dealing with > it. I didn't know every FS implementation have to implement workarround for > that... XFS doesn't do anything with system chipsets, I think Seth just meant that the later kernels might fix VIA problems. The "official" XFS 1.0.1 release is against 2.4.5, so if you need fixes in kernels after that, you'll need to go with a CVS snapshot patch. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: %u-order allocation failed, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: redhat 7.2 installer?, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - Improvement request for xfsdump/xfsrestore exit codes, Andrew Gildfind |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |