| To: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch? |
| From: | Blizbor <tb670725@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:17:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3127.1002524824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Your message of "08 Oct 2001 08:53:52 +0200." <tgwv26aagv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 10/8/01 09:07 AM, Keith Owens wrote: >On 08 Oct 2001 08:53:52 +0200, >Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>I'm going to set up a new machine with substantially more disk space I >>used to have before, and I wonder if I should use the XFS CVS version >>or the kernel patch. > >Are you feeling lucky? The CVS tree is bleeding edge with minimal >testing. The kernel patches, particularly the official releases (1.0.1 >is current) get much more testing but are against older kernels. Sounds interesting. I'm using only CVS tree kernels and never had problems. (OK - I'm using also released kernales, but only during install from CD). Have you any problems with CVS kernels ? Regards, Blizbor -- </Microsoft> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |