| To: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch? |
| From: | Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 08 Oct 2001 15:13:36 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3127.1002524824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Keith Owens's message of "Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:07:04 +1000") |
| References: | <3127.1002524824@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7 |
Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Are you feeling lucky? Full moon tonight? ;-) > The CVS tree is bleeding edge with minimal testing. Does it include new significant XFS development, or is it just tracking the mainline kernel? > The kernel patches, particularly the official releases (1.0.1 > is current) get much more testing but are against older kernels. Exactly that's the problem. For example, at least one significant bug has been fixed in 2.4.7, therefore I would hate to go back to 2.4.5 (although the fix is trivial). -- Florian Weimer Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx University of Stuttgart http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/ RUS-CERT +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Quotactl change, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Steve Lord |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |