| To: | Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch? |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Oct 2001 09:08:54 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <tgwv26aagv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 08:53 8-10-2001 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: I'm going to set up a new machine with substantially more disk space I used to have before, and I wonder if I should use the XFS CVS version or the kernel patch. (Forgive me if this is in the FAQ, I haven't found it.) Depends on the hardware. If you have a VIA based system better use the CVS version. Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Keith Owens |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Quotactl change, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Keith Owens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Hristo Grigorov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |