| To: | ivanr@xxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: WAS: Cluster XFS install without CD... MY APOLOGIES |
| From: | Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Oct 2001 12:25:56 +1100 |
| Cc: | Mike Sowka <msowka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ringram@xxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SGI.4.40.0110081054090.440958-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from ivanr@xxxxxxx on Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:13:19AM +1000 |
| References: | <3BBF372A.2030005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.SGI.4.40.0110081054090.440958-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:13:19AM +1000, ivanr@xxxxxxx wrote: > On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Mike Sowka wrote: > > > #1) How is it that xfsdump is able to dump / while it's mounted? And how > > "industrial-strength" is that? > > xfsdump only works on mounted filesystems. As you suggest, xfsdump might > miss files that are created during a dump, or report a warning if a file > is removed during a dump. When you ask about "industrial strength", this > depends on what your goals and expectations are. > > xfsdump is not really designed as a snapshotting tool. If you want that, > then just umount your filesystem and do something like 'dd if=/dev/sda > of=/dev/tape'. Or use the LVM snapshot feature, with Steve's xfs_freeze(8) tool. -- Nathan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ENOATTR and other error enums, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: WAS: Cluster XFS install without CD... MY APOLOGIES, Timothy Shimmin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: WAS: Cluster XFS install without CD... MY APOLOGIES, ivanr |
| Next by Thread: | XFS and NetBSD, Ian Cooper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |