xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: %u-order allocation failed

from [Alan Cox] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: mikulas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mikulas Patocka)
Subject: Re: %u-order allocation failed
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 23:01:45 +0100 (BST)
Cc: alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan Cox), riel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rik van Riel), kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Krzysztof Rusocki), linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1011007173411.6774A-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Mikulas Patocka" at Oct 07, 2001 05:42:10 PM
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> The difference between memory and vmalloc space is this: you fill up the
> whole memory with cache => memory fragments. You don't fill up the whole
> vmalloc space with anything => vmalloc space doesn't fragment.

vmalloc space fragments. You fragment address space rather than pages thats
all. Same problem
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: %u-order allocation failed, Pavel Machek
Next by Date:  Re: usr quota setup, Nathan Scott
Previous by Thread:  Re: %u-order allocation failed, Mikulas Patocka
Next by Thread:  Re: %u-order allocation failed, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]