xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: %u-order allocation failed

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: %u-order allocation failed
From: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Oct 2001 15:35:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10110052225300.303-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10110052225300.303-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 15:31, Seth Mos wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Seth Mos wrote:
> > 
> > > This happens using either 2.4.10-xfs or 2.4.11-pre3-xfs.
> > 
> > Ohh duh, IIRC there are a bunch of highmem bugs in
> > -linus which are fixed in -ac.
> 
> Fitting XFS onto a -ac kernel should be fun :-(
Actually it's not to bad ... I've been merging the with the
ac kernels as the Mandrake people need them.
I have a 2.4.9 ac 16 patch mostly worked out... if
you want to finish it I could send it to you.

> 
> I will try this over the weekend or get a redhat kernel going which is
> also -ac based. That would come in handy for other people using XFS since
> a lot are using highmem in combination with this fs.
> 
> > Can you reproduce the bug with an -ac kernel ?
> 
> I am not that good/fast at patching. Expect something over the weekend :-)
> 
> Bye
> Seth
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>