xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems?

To: "Utz Lehmann" <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems?
From: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 21:20:16 -0400
Cc: <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <014601c14aed$34616ff0$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200110021239.HAA17289@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011002151459.C16538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <015601c14baf$e783d060$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011004104857.A24928@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I plan on now trying it this weekend . . . got hung up on some other issues.
Thanks for the info!

-Sean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Utz Lehmann" <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Sean Elble" <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Utz Lehmann" <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:48 AM
Subject: Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems?


> Hi Sean
>
> Yes. I tested it with a 2.4.10 XFS kernel (CVS from Sep 24). The pwd
problem
> is gone. But I didn't tests it deeply, make some tests yourself.
>
>
> utz
>
> Sean Elble [S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> > Utz,
> >
> > So, in other words, I shouldn't have any problems checking out the XFS
tree
> > at kernel version 2.4.10? (At least based upon your knowledge)
> >
> > -Sean
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Utz Lehmann" <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Tad Dolphay" <tbd@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:14 AM
> > Subject: Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems?
> >
> >
> > > Tad Dolphay [tbd@xxxxxxx] wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Utz,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the information; do you know if this patch needs to be
> > applied
> > > > > for NFS v3 to work from IRIX to Linux? It looks really easy to
apply
> > > >
> > > > For the most part NFS V3 will still work using a pre 6.5.13 IRIX
client
> > > > and 2.4 linux server. The problem is that sometimes when doing a pwd
on
> > a
> > > > NFS mounted directory you won't see the entire path name.
> > >
> > > Yes, and the IRIX ftpd, Midnight Commander (mc), xemacs, ... are
confused
> > too.
> > >
> > > I just tested a 2.4.10 xfs kernel (with preempt patch, but _without_
the
> > nfs
> > > patch i had attached in my last mail). It's seems to work. My ftpd and
mc
> > > tests are ok. Tested with IRIX 6.5.3 and HP-UX 10.20. So you dont need
the
> > > patch for 2.4.10.
> > >
> > >
> > > utz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>