xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems?

To: Sean Elble <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems?
From: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 10:48:57 +0200
Cc: Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <015601c14baf$e783d060$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx on Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:05:38PM -0400
References: <014601c14aed$34616ff0$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200110021239.HAA17289@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20011002151459.C16538@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <015601c14baf$e783d060$0a00a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
Hi Sean

Yes. I tested it with a 2.4.10 XFS kernel (CVS from Sep 24). The pwd problem
is gone. But I didn't tests it deeply, make some tests yourself.


utz

Sean Elble [S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> Utz,
> 
> So, in other words, I shouldn't have any problems checking out the XFS tree
> at kernel version 2.4.10? (At least based upon your knowledge)
> 
> -Sean
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Utz Lehmann" <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Tad Dolphay" <tbd@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: <S_Elble@xxxxxxxxx>; <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: IRIX 6.5.6m/XFS CVS: Any problems?
> 
> 
> > Tad Dolphay [tbd@xxxxxxx] wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Utz,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the information; do you know if this patch needs to be
> applied
> > > > for NFS v3 to work from IRIX to Linux? It looks really easy to apply
> > >
> > > For the most part NFS V3 will still work using a pre 6.5.13 IRIX client
> > > and 2.4 linux server. The problem is that sometimes when doing a pwd on
> a
> > > NFS mounted directory you won't see the entire path name.
> >
> > Yes, and the IRIX ftpd, Midnight Commander (mc), xemacs, ... are confused
> too.
> >
> > I just tested a 2.4.10 xfs kernel (with preempt patch, but _without_ the
> nfs
> > patch i had attached in my last mail). It's seems to work. My ftpd and mc
> > tests are ok. Tested with IRIX 6.5.3 and HP-UX 10.20. So you dont need the
> > patch for 2.4.10.
> >
> >
> > utz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>