xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.9 is bad

To: rvt@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: 2.4.9 is bad
From: Tommy Wu <newsletter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 14:58:05 +0800
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <3BB957A2.E1DB930E@xxxxxx>
Organization: TeaTime Development
References: <E631530D51ABD411B823009027855C5B0276C9@THOR> <3BB957A2.E1DB930E@xxxxxx>
Reply-to: tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Ries van twisk <rvt@xxxxxx> wrote:

> I have 2.4.9 installaed on a vaniella Linux kernel with XFS and it works
> perfectly. I must say that the machine is my internet gateway and
> fileserver but is not to buzy.

   Here are 6 machine running 2.4.9-xfs..., 5 in my office, 1 in my home..
   
   in office:
   1 for firewall, 1 p2-233 cpu, 192m ram....
   1 for samba server, 1 p2-300 cpu 192m ram...
   1 for samba server, 1 p-75 cpu 128m ram...
   and 2 for oracle server, 2 p3-1G cpu, 2g ram...

    in my home:
   1 for firewall, samba server.  , 2 p-233 cpu, 256m ram....
   
   Only in the 2 machine with 2 * p3-1g cpu and 2g ram have such problem...
   So I think this problem should be some VM problem with SMP and 
   HIGHMEM enabled.

-- 

    Tommy Wu
    mailto:tommy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    http://www.teatime.com.tw/~tommy
    ICQ: 22766091
    Mobile Phone: +886 936 909490
    TeaTime BBS +886 2 31515964 24Hrs V.Everything




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>