| To: | Takayuki Sasaki <sasaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump/restore changes for ia64 |
| From: | Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Oct 2001 17:52:30 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200110010736.QAA26557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from sasaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:36:34PM +0900 |
| References: | <20011001170329.A1372@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200110010736.QAA26557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi Takayuki, On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 04:36:34PM +0900, Takayuki Sasaki wrote: > > Thank you for your time. You're welcome. > > This abstraction (one of too many in xfsdump) has a stack checking function > > stkchk() which is only called in main.c in a function "stkplay" > > (it calls itself recursively until it gets stack overflow and outputs > > at what address this happens at...unsure how useful this is) > > which is NEVER compiled in (#ifdef NEVER). > > Yes, shkchk() is nerver compiled, however, this is in > stkchk_register()... > Could I disregard this? Yes. stkchk_register() just sets up some values so that stkchk() can use them later - but it never happens. The only thing that will be evident is that a debug message will no longer be printed for "-v debug=proc" debug level. But who cares :) Cheers, Tim. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump/restore changes for ia64, Takayuki Sasaki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | $0.00/min Long Distance, flatrate |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump/restore changes for ia64, Takayuki Sasaki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - xfsdump/restore changes for ia64, Bernhard R. Erdmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |