[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2.4.9 is bad

To: Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.4.9 is bad
From: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 09:17:44 -0500
Cc: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: Message from Paul Schutte <paul@it.up.ac.za> of "Tue, 02 Oct 2001 15:49:18 +0200." <3BB9C5DE.4456EC81@it.up.ac.za>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> I am amazed that it worked.
> If I am correct, the XFS-1.0.1 was a patch against the 2.4.5 kernel.

The patch conflicts of applying that patch would be so large that I
don't think anyone in their right mind would be attempting to fix
the conflicts - and I think you would fall over in an ugly heap before
you got a filesystem mounted.

I was assuming Florin was running a cvs based kernel, but I may have
assumed too much.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>