>From: Takayuki Sasaki <sasaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> me what you think: should we just remove sample_hsm/print_event and rely on
>> the other print_event?
>I think so because sample_hsm/print_eventry was not compiled
>here by make :) then I made it by hand and run it. It seemed
>work successfully, however, there is no document of
>sample_hsm/print_event except itself, so I'm not sure about it.
>Could you tell me what are you using or should I use to evaluate
>dmapi of XFS filesystem? Is there any good tools / documents
>besides cvs tree?
I use the print_event in src/suite1/cmd/print_event.c. It looks like the
print_event in suite1 has a few extra pieces, and some changes in the
formatting. I guess I'm inclined to remove the one in sample_hsm. Most of
the stuff I use is in src/simple, src/common/cmd, and src/suite1, and I do
like to use sample_hsm/mls.
I named suite1 and suite2 in that way because, as far as I could see, suite2
appeared to be a descendant of suite1. The things that are now in src/common
were found in both suite1 and suite2--hence, "common". Suite2 has some
baggage with it, as you may have noticed, and it's possible that it has
something to do with automation (maybe src/suite2/menu_test).
Let's see...the only piece I haven't explained is src/simple. That's the
stuff I made back when I needed some simple tests, and the rest of this jumble
of test suites was making me dizzy.
If you're looking for more info on DMAPI you should dig around on: