xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: More testing RPMs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: More testing RPMs
From: "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 16:26:35 -0600
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I just started trying it. Sorry for the conusion. I started using it because
I put a sleep(1); just after the print garbage and noticed that the system
was writing out in 4096 byte chunks. The mount options there are from a
progression of trying different things.


-- 
Austin Gonyou
Systems Architect, CCNA
Coremetrics, Inc.
Phone: 512-796-9023
email: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Burger [mailto:mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:15 PM
> To: Eric Sandeen
> Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: More testing RPMs
> 
> 
> Question.
> 
> I'm currently running the 2.4.9-7 on my RH7.1 machine.
> 
> Is there really that much of a difference, or am I ok in 
> continuing that 
> trend.
> 
> I ask as I haven't had any problems, yet, with 2.4.9-7PR3...I 
> don't mind 
> continuing to test these out, but I feel I should go the correct path.
> 
> On 31 Oct 2001, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
> > Ok gang, this time you get "PR4"
> > 
> > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/RH2.4.9-6 
> (for RH7.1)
> > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/RH2.4.9-7 
> (for RH7.2)
> > 
> > Changes in PR4:
> > 
> > * Disabled (broken) xfs support in intermezzo
> > 
> > * Merged in a few recent xfs fixes
> > 
> > Have fun,
> > 
> > -Eric
> > 
> > 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>