xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: gcc 2.91.66, 2.95.3, 2.95.4, growfs -- off-topic

To: b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx (Bryan-TheBS-Smith)
Subject: Re: gcc 2.91.66, 2.95.3, 2.95.4, growfs -- off-topic
From: Sidik Isani <isani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:20:36 -1000 (HST)
Cc: kris.buggenhout@xxxxxxx (kris buggenhout), linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx (linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx)
In-reply-to: <3BD9DD33.4A0B6EC@ieee.org> from "Bryan-TheBS-Smith" at Oct 26, 2001 06:01:23 PM
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
<Bryan-TheBS-Smith wrote:>
|We all know about RedHat's ripping ** of the incomplete GCC 2.96
|development branch from the GCC tree, for which the Cygnus guys
|incremented to 2.97 which eventually became the 3.0 release.  I had

  Doesn't RedHat OWN Cygnus?

- Sidik


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>