Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected.

[Utz Lehmann <ulehmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve Lord [lord@xxxxxxx] wrote:
> > >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > Steve> Ah ha, now thats a good idea - of course I still think its the
> > Steve> md code, but at least we have a chance of catching it now.
> > 
> > I took a look at MD last night and didn't see anything obvious
> > sticking out.
> > 
> > Will do a second pass in a bit...
> > 
> > -- 
> > Martin K. Petersen      Cereal Bowl Engineer, Linuxcare, Inc.
> > http://mkp.net/         SGI XFS, Linux/PA-RISC, GNOME
> 
> Martin, forget md, you can make this happen without it, looks like we 
> introduced a sign bug ourselves somewhere.... I just toasted the loop
> based filesystem in about 10 seconds. Hopefully with a case this 
> simple to reproduce it should not take long now.

Is the loop device unsign safe?


utz