| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Linux page cache doubt |
| From: | Arun Ramakrishnan <ramakria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Oct 2001 16:26:33 -0400 |
| Organization: | Cluster I/O Lab,CIS Dept, The Ohio State Univ |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 |
|
Hi All, I recently read that all fs codes actually do I/O to and from the pagecache and then the dirty pages are synced to the disk later using the bdflush daemon.This approach has some performance problems when I/O is done thru write calls rather than mmap. I was just curious whether this path was modified when XFS was written ( ie how cud such a approach even work in case of jounalled file system when log operations are needed bfore the data gets written out). I am kinda newbie into kernel hacking and so i am sorry if my question sounds dumb. Cheers, Arun. -- Arun Ramakrishnan Graduate Research Assistant / Sys Admin Linux Cluster I/O Lab The Ohio State University Ph : (614)-294-5523 (H)
(614)-292-4634 (O) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: For Testing - updated RH7.1 XFS 2.4.9-6 kernels, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Corruption of in-memory data detected., Marc Schmitt |
| Previous by Thread: | Makefile, Hristo Grigorov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linux page cache doubt, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |