xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser

To: Hristo Grigorov <Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ext3 + xfs + jfs + reiser
From: Justin Coffey <justin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 11:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10110221052450.2182-100000@paperboy.websocietyinc.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Er, that was "Now, I'm NOT trying to start a flame."

The subconscious speaks, no?

> > On Monday 22 October 2001 20:43, Derek Glidden wrote:
> > > Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > > Dunno about a single patch, but the latest Mandrake has all of those
> > > > filesystems co-existing.
> > >
> > > On a slight tangent, I was at an expo last week and a SuSE guy was also
> > > there.  A brief discussion popped up about journaling filesystems and we
> > > determined that XFS was *not* going to be in SuSE 7.3 while Reiser, ext3
> > > and JFS were.  His explanation was that XFS was not stable enough but
> > > had no more technical information.
> > >
> > > Can any SuSE guys around here comment more on that?
> > >
> > > (My suspicions are really less that it's unstable and more that it
> > > touches pretty deeply into the rest of the VFS layer that made them
> > > unhappy and not want to use it for whatever reason.  Some of the same
> > > stuff I've seen Alan Cox mention here.)
> > >
> > 
> > Weird... Both SuSe and RedHat pretend to aim enterprise market and at the 
> > same time they don't want to support _real_ enterprise filesystems like XFS 
> > and JFS. I would bet that most mission critical servers out there run 
> > either 
> > JFS or XFS as they are long-time tested, well documented and has some 
> > kind of official support. The only idea that comes to my mind is that they 
> > don't like the idea that commercial companies controls the sources for 
> > those 
> > FS even that they are opened to the public community. Not-stable is 
> > obviously 
> > not the reason here... Kudos for Mandrake anyway! :)
> 
> I'm not sure I agree.  We tested smallish sized hardware raids with XFS
> (albeit about 3 months ago) and had a devil of a time trying to get it
> work correctly.  Generally, we just ran into the OS not being able to
> mount the array, seizing and having to perform a hard reboot.  Now, I'm
> all about fiddling and getting things to work, but for production, mission
> critical data?  No thank you.  ReiserFS has worked flawlessly for us in
> XFS's stead.
> 
> Now, I'm trying to start a flame, and I'm not bashing XFS in anyway, this
> was just my last experience with it.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Justin Coffey                                        coffeyj@xxxxxxxxx
> Technical Advisor                                 http://www.homes.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Justin Coffey                                          coffeyj@xxxxxxxxx
Technical Advisor                                   http://www.homes.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>