xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS

Subject: Re: Daily XFS CVS RPMS
From: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:39:46 -0600
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200110192316.XAA00329@groucho.maths.monash.edu.au> <3BD0BD18.2272B325@idcomm.com> <3BD1FDB1.4ED31DF5@idcomm.com> <200110202220.AAA02493@server.nick.de> <3BD24607.2BFAB6E@idcomm.com> <20011021140727.A2809@s2y4n2c.de>
Reply-to: stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
utz lehmann wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> D. Stimits [stimits@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> > I don't know if the NVidia stuff is merely binary-only, and follows DRM
> > specs, or if it is both binary-only AND uses its own DRM infrastructure.
> 
> Its (mostly) binary only and has its own kernelinterface (/dev/nvidia*).
> 
> > >From what has been said, it *appears* that a kernel configured for 4.1.x
> > DRM will not work with NVidia...I don't know, this is part of the
> > confusion.
> 
> That is not true. You _dont_ need DRM support at all for the nvidia driver.
> 
> utz

This would be welcome news for my machine with NVidia. I assume it is
still possible to get hardware accel?

On the other hand, how will this work on the machine with non-NVidia
hardware...will it be able to run 4.0.3 on all kernels it boots? Or will
I need to run 4.1.x? And if I run 4.1.x, will I have at least as good of
a quality (rephrased, stable and reasonable frame rate) OpenGL hardware
accel as with 4.0.3?

D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>