| To: | erich@xxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: kernel update for RH7.1 users? |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Oct 2001 18:28:03 +0200 |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, werner maes <werner.maes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E15ubOC-00009D-00@trillium-hollow.org>; from erich@uruk.org on Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 08:16:47AM -0700 |
| References: | <200110191432.f9JEWLt10484@jen.americas.sgi.com> <E15ubOC-00009D-00@trillium-hollow.org> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.16i |
> I still worry about some things being broken, since there seems rather > sloppy testing going on before each kernel is put out, and other things > always slip in after something is known to work. > > (can you tell I disapprove?) The problem in Linux is that broad testing only works on "releases" (ie there is no way to distribute something to test to a bigger testing audience without a release) Normally that would be 2.x, x uneven kernels where everybody expects occasional brokenness. Unfortunately no non-even tree exists ATM. People that just want kernels that are tested and work currently need another testing "filter"; e.g. a distributor. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfsrestore assertion failure, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfsdump: WARNING: unable to backspace tape: assuming media error, Ngan, Michael (NCI) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: kernel update for RH7.1 users?, Mike Burger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: kernel update for RH7.1 users?, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |