xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.)

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Compilers (was Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet.)
From: nic <nic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:30:05 +0100
Envelope-to: <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
In-reply-to: <3BC45B58.EEC0AA7E@sgi.com>
Organization: Quixotic Hackers
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011010132408.02d1f3f0@pop.xs4all.nl> <E15rIfX-0000JG-00@pyewacket.nic.uklinux.net> <3BC45B58.EEC0AA7E@sgi.com>
Reply-to: nic@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wednesday 10 October 2001 15:29, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Compilers are still a touchy subject... we just found one compiler bug
> last week  w/ the RH 7.1 version of GCC, which caused filesystem
> corruption if you use xfs_growfs.  gcc 3.0.1 from Mandrake did not
> exibit this problem...
>
> In short, "kgcc" is still the only compiler that we have a lot of
> confidence in - others may work most of the time, but I still don't have
> a "warm fuzzy" about any of them.

OK - I tried gcc 3.0.0 and it did exactly the same. I'm suspecting my source 
tree is corrupt. Not what you want over a 'phone line.

Thanks all,
nic


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>