| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: CXFS [was: XFS (v.1.0.1 for RedHat 7.1) and XFS (Irix 6.5.13m) differ?] |
| From: | Rob Latham <rlatham@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:23:22 -0400 |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SGI.4.10.10110091646150.288437-100000@plato.med.harvard.edu>; from shyberts@plato.med.harvard.edu on Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 05:05:35PM -0400 |
| References: | <200109271535.f8RFZf908442@jen.americas.sgi.com> <Pine.SGI.4.10.10110091646150.288437-100000@plato.med.harvard.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 05:05:35PM -0400, Sven G Hyberts wrote: > I made a couple of attempts to get GFS on a Linux machine. It > turned out to quite hard - and once I got it through the compiler, I get > the notice that several functions are not defined. Maybe I give it > another attempt - yet after realizing that it is a non-journaling file > system format, the lure isn't as "shiny" any more... GFS is indeed a journaling file system. ==rob -- [ Rob Latham <rlatham@xxxxxxxxxx> Developer, Admin, Alchemist ] [ Paralogic Inc. - www.plogic.com ] [ ] [ EAE8 DE90 85BB 526F 3181 1FCF 51C4 B6CB 08CC 0897 ] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.11 don't work yet., nic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.4.11 and large files, Robert Sander |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: CXFS [was: XFS (v.1.0.1 for RedHat 7.1) and XFS (Irix 6.5.13m) differ?], Craig Tierney |
| Next by Thread: | TAKE - dquot.c, Nathan Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |