| To: | Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Willi.Langenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug in sgi-xfs? |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 09 Oct 2001 13:54:17 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20011009131721.A9570@main.braxis.co.uk> |
| References: | <15298.49018.477634.619452@slime.wu-wien.ac.at> <15298.48625.831518.499561@slime.wu-wien.ac.at> <15298.49018.477634.619452@slime.wu-wien.ac.at> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 13:17 9-10-2001 +0200, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:12:26AM +0200, Willi Langenberger wrote: That would mean a kernel needs to be heavily tested before it can be used for an update disk. Since the development is past 1.0.1 already and fitting 1.0.1 from 2.4.5 on a newer kernel wouldn't be a really good idea either. It is very likely that by the time a redhat 7.2 update disk comes along we will probably have a newer version included anyways. What you could also do is use the Mandrake 8.1 kernel since this also supports XFS and is well tested before release. Since the dependencies with the rpms are tricky you can download a tar.bz2 here: http://iserv.nl/files/xfs/ This is the contents of the kernel-source rpm but a bit easier to handle. It will extract into a linux directory and is a 2.4.8-ac12 kernel. YMMV Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: %u-order allocation failed, Rik van Riel |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Quotactl change, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug in sgi-xfs?, Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug in sgi-xfs?, Krzysztof Rusocki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |