xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug in sgi-xfs?

To: Krzysztof Rusocki <kszysiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Willi.Langenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Bug in sgi-xfs?
From: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 13:54:17 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20011009131721.A9570@main.braxis.co.uk>
References: <15298.49018.477634.619452@slime.wu-wien.ac.at> <15298.48625.831518.499561@slime.wu-wien.ac.at> <15298.49018.477634.619452@slime.wu-wien.ac.at>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 13:17 9-10-2001 +0200, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:12:26AM +0200, Willi Langenberger wrote:

I have a note to linux-xfs developers: don't you think that it would be
a good step to provide  2.4.10 kernel rpms for 1.0.1 release ? or maybe
the testing it received is still not sufficient ?

That would mean a kernel needs to be heavily tested before it can be used for an update disk.
Since the development is past 1.0.1 already and fitting 1.0.1 from 2.4.5 on a newer kernel wouldn't be a really good idea either.


It is very likely that by the time a redhat 7.2 update disk comes along we will probably have a newer version included anyways.

What you could also do is use the Mandrake 8.1 kernel since this also supports XFS and is well tested before release.

Since the dependencies with the rpms are tricky you can download a tar.bz2 here:
http://iserv.nl/files/xfs/


This is the contents of the kernel-source rpm but a bit easier to handle.
It will extract into a linux directory and is a 2.4.8-ac12 kernel.

YMMV

Cheers

--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>