| To: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch? |
| From: | Hristo Grigorov <Hristo.Grigorov@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:46:30 +0300 |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011008090816.03ebe8c0@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| References: | <4.3.2.7.2.20011008090816.03ebe8c0@pop.xs4all.nl> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Monday 08 October 2001 10:08, Seth Mos wrote: > At 08:53 8-10-2001 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >I'm going to set up a new machine with substantially more disk space I > >used to have before, and I wonder if I should use the XFS CVS version > >or the kernel patch. > > > >(Forgive me if this is in the FAQ, I haven't found it.) > > Depends on the hardware. If you have a VIA based system better use the CVS > version. > > Cheers Hmm, may I have more information on that ? I have VIA system but I thought that the other subsystems of the kernel are taking care about dealing with it. I didn't know every FS implementation have to implement workarround for that... -- Regards, Hristo. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Linus broke it again?, Alan Eldridge |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Linus broke it again?, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Seth Mos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Steve Lord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |