xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?
From: Blizbor <tb670725@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:17:26 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3127.1002524824@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <Your message of "08 Oct 2001 08:53:52 +0200." <tgwv26aagv.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
At 10/8/01 09:07 AM, Keith Owens wrote:
>On 08 Oct 2001 08:53:52 +0200, 
>Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>I'm going to set up a new machine with substantially more disk space I
>>used to have before, and I wonder if I should use the XFS CVS version
>>or the kernel patch.
>
>Are you feeling lucky?  The CVS tree is bleeding edge with minimal
>testing.  The kernel patches, particularly the official releases (1.0.1
>is current) get much more testing but are against older kernels.


Sounds interesting. I'm using only CVS tree kernels and never had problems.
(OK - I'm using also released kernales, but only during install from CD).

Have you any problems with CVS kernels ?

Regards,
Blizbor

-- 
</Microsoft>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>