| To: | Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch? |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:07:04 +1000 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "08 Oct 2001 08:53:52 +0200." <tgwv26aagv.fsf@mercury.rus.uni-stuttgart.de> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 08 Oct 2001 08:53:52 +0200, Florian Weimer <Florian.Weimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I'm going to set up a new machine with substantially more disk space I >used to have before, and I wonder if I should use the XFS CVS version >or the kernel patch. Are you feeling lucky? The CVS tree is bleeding edge with minimal testing. The kernel patches, particularly the official releases (1.0.1 is current) get much more testing but are against older kernels. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TAKE - Improvement request for xfsdump/xfsrestore exit codes, Andrew Gildfind |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Seth Mos |
| Previous by Thread: | Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Florian Weimer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Use CVS version or kernel patch?, Florian Weimer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |