| To: | Paul Schutte <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.4.9 is bad |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 02 Oct 2001 09:17:44 -0500 |
| Cc: | Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Paul Schutte <paul@it.up.ac.za> of "Tue, 02 Oct 2001 15:49:18 +0200." <3BB9C5DE.4456EC81@it.up.ac.za> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> I am amazed that it worked. > > If I am correct, the XFS-1.0.1 was a patch against the 2.4.5 kernel. The patch conflicts of applying that patch would be so large that I don't think anyone in their right mind would be attempting to fix the conflicts - and I think you would fall over in an ugly heap before you got a filesystem mounted. I was assuming Florin was running a cvs based kernel, but I may have assumed too much. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.4.9 is bad, Steve Lord |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ACLs, Lawrence Walton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.4.9 is bad, Paul Schutte |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.4.9 is bad, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |