| To: | Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS to main kernel source |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:39:58 +0200 |
| Cc: | kris buggenhout <buggenkr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <3BAB3018.CFE4290C@xxxxxxxx>; from b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx on Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:18:32AM -0400 |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.33.0109211018430.21430-100000@helka> <3BAB119A.29888F3D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BAB3018.CFE4290C@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 08:18:32AM -0400, Bryan-TheBS-Smith wrote:
> JFS seems to be lacking as much compatibility as ReiserFS.
> Something tells me that this is because it was a port from OS/2
> rather than AIX's version??? I haven't used or tested JFS so I'm
> making these statements blind. Feel free to rebuke me on this, I
> just looked at its feature list, what was missing and dismissed it
> from any consideration.
JFS/Linux is based on JFS for OS/2. JFS2 for AIX5 is based on
JFS for OS/2 as well.
> I take it it is not OSS? ;-PPP It must be OSS or at least of
> commodity cost to gain widespread acceptance, regardless of
> superiority.
There is a free VxFS driver in the Linux kernel driver (written by me),
currently is is read-only, but that will change in the long-term.
But's that's probably not the implementation he was refering to.
Christoph
--
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Bryan-TheBS-Smith |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Lee Go-Tze |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |