xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS to main kernel source

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS to main kernel source
From: Narancs v1 <narancs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:40:16 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20010921075854.A11617@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Oh guys I did not think that this is so "technically impossible".
It's good for me to be informed what phylosofical differences you have
between SGI and Linux programming style.

If the merge will not happen in around a half year - I think SGI/XFS "will
lose market share". And Ext3 is gonna get more of the pie as that is
(maybe) possible to patch in the kernel.

I really hope, that there will be a nice technical solution to this issue
and there will be no political decisions over technical.

Thanks

- -------------------------
Narancs v1
IT Security Administrator

"Security of information is an illusion.
What is in one's mind gets into the collective consciousness (akasha),
so that can be read with meditation ;-) You don't have to hack.
Just 'remember'! You're the one."

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjuq/PUACgkQGp+ylEhMCIV0tQCeLKOrR4z1QZLWugIiA8hDZM7t
TQQAn0fD6QhhtuvNYUZB/si5CQa/XtaE
=k0Lx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>