| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS to main kernel source |
| From: | Narancs v1 <narancs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:40:16 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gonyou, Austin" <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20010921075854.A11617@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Oh guys I did not think that this is so "technically impossible". It's good for me to be informed what phylosofical differences you have between SGI and Linux programming style. If the merge will not happen in around a half year - I think SGI/XFS "will lose market share". And Ext3 is gonna get more of the pie as that is (maybe) possible to patch in the kernel. I really hope, that there will be a nice technical solution to this issue and there will be no political decisions over technical. Thanks - ------------------------- Narancs v1 IT Security Administrator "Security of information is an illusion. What is in one's mind gets into the collective consciousness (akasha), so that can be read with meditation ;-) You don't have to hack. Just 'remember'! You're the one." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjuq/PUACgkQGp+ylEhMCIV0tQCeLKOrR4z1QZLWugIiA8hDZM7t TQQAn0fD6QhhtuvNYUZB/si5CQa/XtaE =k0Lx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| Previous by Date: | Re: more info re /var disappears, Aaron Lehmann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Bad superblock, no secondary, saveme |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, kris buggenhout |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |