| To: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS to main kernel source |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:16:52 -0500 |
| Cc: | austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gonyou, Austin), narancs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> of "Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:14:47 BST." <E15kADf-000632-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Won't there be a lot of changes which need to be made for it to go into 2.5 > > anyway though beyond just current development? Isn't 2.5 supposed to be > > "radically" different? > > Not really. 2.5 will change over time for certain but if anything the 2.5 > changes will make it easier. One problem area with XFS is that it duplicates > chunks of what should be generic functionality - and 2.5 needs to provide > the generic paths it wants Since we have your attention - which chunks? One of the frustrations we have had is the lack of feedback from anyone who has looked at XFS. Just interested. Steve |
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kickstart woes, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Alan Cox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Alan Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS to main kernel source, Alan Cox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |