Re: gcc-2.96-nn status

To:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.96-nn status
From:	Martin Stricker <shugal@xxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:34:28 +0200
Organization:	http://martin-stricker.de/ http://www.surfo.net/ http://www.masterportal24.com/cgi-bin/YaBB.cgi
References:	<20010918124051.A30647@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20010918191512.03352ba8@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20010919010548.0335ae28@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3BA83ECB.D022D19D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

jfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Both RedHat ad Mandrake are poised to ship gcc 3 but gcc 2.96
> will be the default compiler.

This is due to binary compatibility between non-major releases (the ones
only changing the second digit in the version number like 7.0, 7.1), at
least for Red Hat (I don't use Mandrake so I don't know).

Best regards,
Martin Stricker
-- 
Homepage: http://www.martin-stricker.de/
Registered Linux user #210635: http://counter.li.org/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
2.4.10 patch?, (continued) 2.4.10 patch?, Austin Gonyou Re: 2.4.10 patch?, Seth Mos Re: 2.4.10 patch?, Keith Owens RE: 2.4.10 patch?, Steven Tower Re: 2.4.10 patch?, Keith Owens Re: 2.4.10 patch?, D. Stimits Re: 2.4.10 patch?, Eric Sandeen Re: 2.4.10 patch?, Russ Ingram Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, jfm2 Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, kris buggenhout Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Martin Stricker <= Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Adam Cioccarelli Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Martin Stricker Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Steve Lord Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Seth Mos Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Alan Eldridge Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Seth Mos Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Joseph Fannin Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Keith Owens

Previous by Date:	Use of SGI-XFS-1.0.1 with RAID..., Drew 'Cheetah!' Maxwell
Next by Date:	Re: Samba error during build when ACL support enabled, Federico Sevilla III
Previous by Thread:	Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, kris buggenhout
Next by Thread:	Re: gcc-2.96-nn status, Adam Cioccarelli
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]