xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs_estimate

To: Takayuki Sasaki <sasaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs_estimate
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:34:43 +1000
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200109130756.QAA08490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from sasaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:56:00PM +0900
References: <200109130756.QAA08490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 04:56:00PM +0900, Takayuki Sasaki wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> First of all, thank you for your time to explain xfsdump.
> I am happy to know about it. Thanks.
> 
> Today, I have a little question - the default log size of
> xfs_estimate. The man data of xfs_estimate says it is 10MB, but
> "xfs_estimate -v foo" says it is 4096000. Which is correct?
> 

>From a quick look in the code, it seems the man page is
incorrect - the default logsize is 4096 (default blksize)
multiplied by 1000 (default log length).

xfs_estimate -v -i 4000k xxx ... seems to confirm this.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • xfs_estimate, Takayuki Sasaki
    • Re: xfs_estimate, Nathan Scott <=