| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | 10minutes for rm -rf on 400MB |
| From: | Dirk Wetter <dirkw@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 09 Sep 2001 13:17:47 -0400 |
| Cc: | Karsten Künne <kuenne@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3+) Gecko/20010817 |
|
Hi, we've been running XFS on the data disks of our HPC Linux cluster since a while. we are quite happy with xfs, thx guys for your work! the setup is: - dual >=1GHZ box, 4GB mem - lvm 0.9beta7, phys. volume size ~140 GB, logical vol for xfs: 100GB - no additional mount options or options for mkfs.xfs were given - kernel 2.4.8pre4-xfs, highly patched SuSE 7.0 (not that it should matter) a user complained that rm -rf of 400MB takes ~10 minutes (!) until the command returns, whereas on the systems with reiserfs we have e.g. it takes seconds. i don't know so much about the quality of the data, my guess is that some files are small (~100k), others a big (a few hundred MB). i read in the FAQ that XFS isn't particular good in rm-rf'ing files, which isn't really the issue for us, because in 99.9%of the time data is being read from the volume and not removed via rm -rf. is there an mount/filecreation option to tweak without loosing performance while reading? cheers, ~dirkw |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Mounting onboard raid, Bryan Payne |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ftp.thebarn.com, Alan Eldridge |
| Previous by Thread: | Mounting onboard raid, Bryan Payne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 10minutes for rm -rf on 400MB, Federico Sevilla III |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |