| To: | "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Are there any issues with Sparcstations |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:26:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | James <jdickens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <yq1itevpely.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx>; from mkp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:52:25AM -0400 |
| References: | <20010907050943.DBDK10497.mailhost.mil.ameritech.net@there> <yq1itevpely.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 04:52:25AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > >>>>> "James" == James <jdickens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > James> I am happily running XFS on my main home file server (intel), > James> and am thinking about using XFS on my new ( for me, anyway) > James> Sparcstation 5, it will be a couple of small partitions less > James> than 5gig each, that will house a small news feed, is XFS (cvs) > James> ready/compatible with Sparc's running Linux ? > > I haven't tried XFS on SPARC in a long time, so I don't know for sure. > With a SPARCstation 5 you should be fine, though. At least _pagebuf_free_lockable_buffer is clearly not sparc32 safe, because it gets save_flags flags arguments passed as an argument and will mess up the register window. So I doubt it'll work. -Andi |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: compaq smart 2 raid and XFS 1.0.1 redhat install problems, Martin K. Petersen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Are there any issues with Sparcstations, Martin K. Petersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Are there any issues with Sparcstations, Martin K. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Are there any issues with Sparcstations, Martin K. Petersen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |