Re: smaller mkfs.xfs

xfs

Re: smaller mkfs.xfs

To:	Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: smaller mkfs.xfs
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:02:47 -0500
Cc:	linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References:	<20010904043952.V14519@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010905104700.E324361@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904160632.I14519@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx

Ethan Benson wrote:

> yes 2.95.4 is whats there now..  is there any kind of regression
> testing i can do to see if any bugs are introduced by -Os ?

There is a suite of tests under cmd/xfstests, edit common.config for
your machine, and then just run ./check 0?? - none of this is
specifically designed to test -0s, but it will make filesystems and
check them in various ways...  it would be a place to start, in any
case.

-Eric

-- 
Eric Sandeen      XFS for Linux     http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs
sandeen@xxxxxxx   SGI, Inc.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
smaller mkfs.xfs, Ethan Benson Re: smaller mkfs.xfs, Nathan Scott Re: smaller mkfs.xfs, Ethan Benson Re: smaller mkfs.xfs, Eric Sandeen <=

Previous by Date:	Re: kernel spam when mounting xfs, Andi Kleen
Next by Date:	On RAID, inode size, stripe size (was: Playing around with NFS+XFS), Federico Sevilla III
Previous by Thread:	Re: smaller mkfs.xfs, Ethan Benson
Next by Thread:	root mount mislabled.., Joseph Southwell
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]