| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TAKE - mount msgs |
| From: | Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 04 Sep 2001 15:22:32 -0700 |
| In-reply-to: | <4.3.2.7.2.20010904152044.035d3b48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20010904225323.A344731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200109041139.VAA08035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904134437.A28205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904225323.A344731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4.3.2.7.2.20010904152044.035d3b48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On 04 Sep 2001 15:23:12 +0200, Seth Mos wrote: > > I like having at least one message that it mounted a certain fs. I can then > use dmesg to see if it actually worked, and if it needs to recover or if it > fails I like to see it as well. One line per partition seems to be the best tradeoff: "filesystem /dev/blahblah failed" or "filesystem /dev/foobar succeeded" or something. And maybe just one more line when the module is loaded up (if XFS is a module). -- Florin Andrei "Our kernel does have source control: its name is Linus Torvalds, CVS with a brain." - Nicholas Knight |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Playing around with NFS+XFS, yocum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE - mount msgs, Nathan Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TAKE - mount msgs, Ethan Benson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: TAKE - mount msgs, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |