Re: TAKE - mount msgs

[Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04 Sep 2001 16:23:02 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:01:29AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:55:55PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:21:13AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:43:23PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Keeping the initial message only would be fine for me.
> > > > 
> > > > why? at least on debian mount is called with -v which prints its own
> > > > (more informative) mounting message
> > > 
> > > Doesn't help for the root fs.
> > 
> > um... if the root filesystem doesn't mount i think your going to
> > notice ;-)
> 
> The point is that you can quickly blame XFS for it ("it crashed in XFS log
> replay"). With no message it is a lot harder to find which subsystem to 
> debug.
Yes... I agree, having a the mount message is very helpful especially
when loading xfs as a module... 

I vote for leaving the message in ... maybe shrink it to one line if
people really thinks it's "cluttering" up the log to much.
 
> 
> 
> -Andi