Re: TAKE - mount msgs

[Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andi Kleen schrieb:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:01:29AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:55:55PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:21:13AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:43:23PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Keeping the initial message only would be fine for me.
> > > >
> > > > why? at least on debian mount is called with -v which prints its own
> > > > (more informative) mounting message
> > >
> > > Doesn't help for the root fs.
> >
> > um... if the root filesystem doesn't mount i think your going to
> > notice ;-)
> 
> The point is that you can quickly blame XFS for it ("it crashed in XFS log
> replay"). With no message it is a lot harder to find which subsystem to
> debug.

I agree with this.

Anyway it's a really good sign for XFS. If we don't have more important
stuff to discuss here it means that XFS is _really_ good. I know it is
very good but...

-Simon