xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - mount msgs

To: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TAKE - mount msgs
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:23:02 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20010904060129.A14519@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:01:29AM -0800
References: <200109041139.VAA08035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904134437.A28205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904225323.A344731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904144323.B29262@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904052113.X14519@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904155555.A30796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904060129.A14519@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:01:29AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 03:55:55PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:21:13AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 02:43:23PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Keeping the initial message only would be fine for me.
> > > 
> > > why? at least on debian mount is called with -v which prints its own
> > > (more informative) mounting message
> > 
> > Doesn't help for the root fs.
> 
> um... if the root filesystem doesn't mount i think your going to
> notice ;-)

The point is that you can quickly blame XFS for it ("it crashed in XFS log
replay"). With no message it is a lot harder to find which subsystem to 
debug.


-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>