xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Block size.

To: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Block size.
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:47:31 +0200
Cc: Dario Brignardello <dbrignar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <11089.999606324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:25:24PM +1000
References: <3B94BFD9.83E09CEE@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <11089.999606324@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:25:24PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2001 08:49:45 -0300, 
> Dario Brignardello <dbrignar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >        Sorry for bother with a newbie question, but I didn't find the
> >answer in the FAQ:-). I would like to now the reasons (technically
> >speaking) for the max block size to be fixed at 4K in linux
> 
> It is a restriction of the Linux VM subsystem, at the moment file block
> size must equal hardware page size.  There is work in progress to
> remove the restriction, but it is kernel 2.5 code.

Minor correction: it must be smaller or equal hardware block size.

-Andi


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>