[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TAKE - mount msgs

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TAKE - mount msgs
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 04:32:17 -0800
In-reply-to: <20010904225323.A344731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from nathans@xxxxxxx on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:53:23PM +1100
Mail-copies-to: nobody
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200109041139.VAA08035@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904134437.A28205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010904225323.A344731@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 10:53:23PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> hi Andi,
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:44:37PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:39:42PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > Consensus seems to be less chatty on mount - this should do the trick.
> > > Can still get at these messages with a debug build (as is the case for
> > > the nightly QA runs) where these messages are still quite useful.
> > 
> > I think it would be better to keep them; as it makes debugging even on
> > production machines easier.
> > 
> _Now_ you pipe up!  Well, I don't think the "finished clean mount"
> message is particularly useful, but I'll put the initial message
> back in at the start of a mount, I think, so that in the normal case
> its just one message per mount.

please don't, or make it a compile time option.  it makes an ugly mess
of boot messages and clutters the logs with really useless data.

> If anyone else really wants the message at the end of a clean mount,
> I guess I can put that back too...

make it a compile time option if some people want it.  

CONFIG_VERBOSE_MOUNT or something.  

no news is good news.

Ethan Benson

Attachment: pgptG5FkDju42.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>