| To: | Dario Brignardello <dbrignar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Block size. |
| From: | Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 04 Sep 2001 22:25:24 +1000 |
| Cc: | "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2001 08:49:45 -0300." <3B94BFD9.83E09CEE@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 04 Sep 2001 08:49:45 -0300, Dario Brignardello <dbrignar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry for bother with a newbie question, but I didn't find the >answer in the FAQ:-). I would like to now the reasons (technically >speaking) for the max block size to be fixed at 4K in linux It is a restriction of the Linux VM subsystem, at the moment file block size must equal hardware page size. There is work in progress to remove the restriction, but it is kernel 2.5 code. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TAKE - mount msgs, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: TAKE - mount msgs, Ethan Benson |
| Previous by Thread: | Block size., Dario Brignardello |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Block size., Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |