xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs + woody

To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs + woody
From: Lionel <lionel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:55:47 +0200
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010927131901.03e25000@pop.xs4all.nl>
Organization: Esnaola
References: <20010927124213.3e835f87.lionel@esnaola.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20010927131901.03e25000@pop.xs4all.nl>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Seth,
Thanx for your answer but nothing happen in the /var/log/messages when I try to 
lauch daemons. For example I try this ( the same for gdm or ssh) :

irun:~# /etc/init.d/proftpd start
Starting professional ftp daemon: proftpd.

Here is my fstab :

# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# <file system> <mount point>   <type>  <options>                       <dump>
/dev/hda1       /               xfs     defaults        0       0
/dev/hda2       none            swap    sw                      0       0
proc            /proc           proc    defaults                        0
/dev/fd0        /floppy         auto    defaults,user,noauto            0
/dev/cdrom      /cdrom          iso9660 defaults,ro,user,noauto         0
/dev/hda3       /var    xfs     defaults                        0       2
/dev/hda4       /home   xfs     defaults                        0       2

Thanx to help me.

Lionel


On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:20:20 +0200
Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 12:42 27-9-2001 +0200, Lionel wrote:
> >Hi EveryBody !
> >
> >Is there any personn who have some experience woody + xfs installation ?
> >I installed two machines with floppies disks from Zoltan and it work, but 
> >I have problems with daemon.
> >Each time I want to lauch gdm, proftpd, sshd, ... by /etc/init.d/xxxx 
> >start it say nothing and the daemon doesn't run. If I directly lauche sshd 
> >for example it work !!! I don't have the problem with a woody installed 
> >from the upgrade of a potato.
> >
> >Have you some ideas or answers ?!!
> 
> What does /var/log/messages say about the startup scripts failing?
> Perhaps you mounted the / fs with the noexec option? That would make the 
> initscripts fail.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> --
> Seth
> Every program has two purposes one for which
> it was written and another for which it wasn't
> I use the last kind.
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>