| To: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Preemptive patch w/ 2.4.10 |
| From: | Walt H <waltabbyh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:24:12 -0700 |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914 |
Hello, Before I hose my linux box, I've got a quick question regarding the preemptive patches. According to the changelog for the preemptive patches: This is a ChangeLog for patch-rml-preempt Currently synced with 2.4.10-pre14 and 2.4.9-ac14 SMP is now considered stable, but YMMV 20010919 - push XFS fix into XFS CVS Does this mean that there is just the one needed to create preemptive XFS kernel? I've applied the current preemptive patch against the 2.4.10-xfs kernel and it applies (although with a few offsets) and compiles cleanly. If I'm not mistaken, that patch process used to be: Apply preemptive patches Apply XFS patches Apply XFS fixes Am I correct? Sorry about the slightly OT message here, it's just that the entry in the Changelog made me think the fix was already within the CVS tree (which I almost always use to compile kernels from) and all I needed was the preemptive patch against the current CVS - as it's nearly a clean Linus + XFS kernel (I think). Thanks for any help. PS. Thanks to all for the great FS. I still can't believe how awesome it is to run a FREE OS with such awesome capabilities. I really appreciate everyone's hard work. Thanks, -Walt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: problem in "make install" for xfsdump, Nathan Scott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Preemptive patch w/ 2.4.10, Keith Owens |
| Previous by Thread: | problem in "make install" for xfsdump, jtrostel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Preemptive patch w/ 2.4.10, Keith Owens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |