Re: Umask bug in the Installer

To:	Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Umask bug in the Installer - Solved?
From:	Shanker Balan <shanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 9 Sep 2001 16:52:38 +0530
In-reply-to:	<3B8BA1ED.8B5CCBC3@sgi.com>; from sandeen@sgi.com on Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:51:41AM -0500
Mail-followup-to:	Linux-XFS <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Organisation:	Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd <http://www.exocore.com>
References:	<Pine.BSI.4.10.10108280727380.362-100000@xs4.xs4all.nl> <3B8BA1ED.8B5CCBC3@sgi.com>
Reply-to:	Shanker Balan <shanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i

Hello:

Eric Sandeen wrote,
> We did not re-spin the original ISO, but if you use one of the two
> above methods when installing, everything will be fine...

Ok. I will use the updated boot floppy meth0d. Thank you for your
time.

-- 
Darth Vader:
        Your powers are weak, old man.
Ben (Obi-Wan) Kenobi:
        You can't win, Darth. If you strike me down, I shall
        become more powerful than you could possibly
        imagine.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Umask bug in the Installer - Solved?, Shanker Balan <=

Previous by Date:	[patch] Re: XFS, Quotas and Samba, Nathan Scott
Next by Date:	Mounting onboard raid, Bryan Payne
Previous by Thread:	Kickstart on Bootable CDROM, Barrett Gay
Next by Thread:	Mounting onboard raid, Bryan Payne
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Re: Umask bug in the Installer - Solved?