| To: | "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: GPL and DMAPI |
| From: | Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:27:45 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@us.ibm.com> of "Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:31:03 CDT." <OF3DA56F9B.AD7B263D-ON86256ABF.006515F9@boulder.ibm.com> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> The GPL indicates that linking with libraries distributed under it results > in an executable which is also under GPL. This means that any client > program written as a client to the Linux XFS DMAPI library is sucked in > under GPL, even though no GPL code was modified. > > Was this SGI's intent? If so, it seems to effectively destroy any chance > of commercial software interfacing with Linux XFS, via DMAPI or any other > supplied library. > > If not, is there any plan to distribute Linux XFS under the LGPL, which > does allow non-GPL linking? As James found out, the dmapi library is actually already LGPL. so there is no constraint on using it. Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: On RAID, inode size, stripe size (was: Playing around with NFS+XFS), Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: GPL and DMAPI, Dean Roehrich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: GPL and DMAPI, Steve Lord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: GPL and DMAPI, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |