Fwd: Re: TAKE - mount msgs

[Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>]

> X-XS4ALL-To: <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
> X-Sender: blizbor@xxxxxxxxxxx
> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 15:50:10 +0200
> To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
> From: Blizbor <tb670725@xxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: TAKE - mount msgs
>
> At 9/4/01 03:23 PM, you wrote:
> One line is enough. What I don't know is if you could stick these messages 
> on one line. So the first mounting message without a \n and the succes or 
> fail message after it.
>
> >Don't know if it lets us do that.
>
> Sep  5 08:52:20 blizbor kernel: Start mounting filesystem: ide0(3,5)
> Sep  5 08:55:38 blizbor kernel: Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: 
> ide0(3,5)
>
> hmm ... what you can tell about such a system ? :>>>
> Two lines are giving you two timestamps. It gives you chance
> to a) measure performance of bad mounts, b) detect any problems.
>
> Really, I can't find any reason for cutting these lines out.
> When you have one, central logs collecting server you have
> no reason to login and check if filesystems are mounted.
>
> I don't know how to translate polish idiom "bicie piany"
> but this thread is a big waste of time.
> Please leave these lines. Everyone who doesnt like it can
> remove them manually when compiling kernel. What a problem ?
>
> Regards,
> Blizbor
> >--
>
> </Microsoft>

--
Seth
Every program has two purposes one for which
it was written and another for which it wasn't
I use the last kind.