| To: | Gary Orser <orser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: nfs3 problems w/xfs? |
| From: | Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:20:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | Tad Dolphay <tbd@xxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.SGI.4.10.10108300920240.22087-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .edu> |
| References: | <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108300725290.24806-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 09:36 30-8-2001 -0600, Gary Orser wrote: Seth, HeeHaw, that's it. Thanks much! I'm a sysadmin so I have seen lot's of these things before. hdparm -d1 -X23 /dev/hda Same dd test to xfs was 3 min instead of 22! System cpu% single figures, response normal. The over the wire test went from 26 min to 5, achieving about 70mb through put. That's nice but you could also enlarge the network buffers but YMMV. See the other post about XFS + NFS that i had sent out. Cheers -- Seth Every program has two purposes one for which it was written and another for which it wasn't I use the last kind. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Complete lockups while nightly cronjob, Alexander Feigl |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Playing around with NFS+XFS, Federico Sevilla III |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: nfs3 problems w/xfs?, Gary Orser |
| Next by Thread: | umount lvm snapshot panic, Du Jun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |