xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "raid5: multiple 1 requests for sector ..."

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: "raid5: multiple 1 requests for sector ..."
From: Andrew Klaassen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:02:58 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108280728210.362-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10108280728210.362-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:33:56AM +0200, 
Seth Mos wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Andrew Klaassen wrote:

> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 07:15:34PM -0400, 
> > I wrote:
> > 
> > >  - The box doesn't crash...
> > 
> > ...though I do see that 1/2 an hour later the logs report:
> > 
> > kernel: I/O error in filesystem ("md(9,2)") meta-data dev 0x903 block 
> > 0x13fbe
> > kernel:        ("<NULL>") error -1070893103 buf count 5
> > kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(md(9,2),0x2) called from line 940 of file 
> > xfs_log.c.  Return address = 0xc01c329c
> > kernel: Log I/O Error Detected.  Shutting down filesystem: md(9,2)
> > kernel: Please umount the filesystem, and rectify the problem(s)
> > 
> > I've got no idea if this might be related or not.

> It seems so related to the problems you mentioned earlier that
> you would almost think so. It doesn't have to be perse.


> What was the kernel and with what compiler?

A 2.4.9 CVS checkout from August 17.

> I remember you saw this with a OSF1 nfs client?

No, that must have been somebody else...

Andrew Klaassen


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>